comparison src/InductiveTypes.v @ 37:c9ade53b27aa

TVL and constant-folding exercises
author Adam Chlipala <adamc@hcoop.net>
date Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:30:59 -0400
parents 9e46ade5af21
children 95e24b629ad9
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
36:9e46ade5af21 37:c9ade53b27aa
1089 change (pred (S n) = pred (S m)). 1089 change (pred (S n) = pred (S m)).
1090 rewrite H. 1090 rewrite H.
1091 reflexivity. 1091 reflexivity.
1092 Qed. 1092 Qed.
1093 1093
1094
1095 (** * Exercises *)
1096
1097 (** %\begin{enumerate}%#<ol>#
1098
1099 %\item%#<li># Define an inductive type [truth] with three constructors, [Yes], [No], and [Maybe]. [Yes] stands for certain truth, [False] for certain falsehood, and [Maybe] for an unknown situation. Define "not," "and," and "or" for this replacement boolean algebra. Prove that your implementation of "and" is commutative and distributes over your implementation of "or."#</li>#
1100
1101 %\item%#<li># Modify the first example language of Chapter 1 to include variables, where variables are represented with [nat]. Extend the syntax and semantics of expressions to accommodate the change. Your new [expDenote] function should take as a new extra first argument a value of type [var -> nat], where [var] is a synonym for naturals-as-variables, and the function assigns a value to each variable. Define a constant folding function which does a bottom-up pass over an expression, at each stage replacing every binary operation on constants with an equivalent constant. Prove that constant folding preserves the meaning of expressions.#</li>#
1102
1103 #</ol>#%\end{enumerate}% *)