changeset 545:4f6e7bab0d45

Make a theorem name more consistent
author Adam Chlipala <adam@chlipala.net>
date Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:50:53 -0500
parents 71b85aaae868
children 306539f29eea
files src/Match.v
diffstat 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/Match.v	Thu Oct 15 07:42:00 2015 -0400
+++ b/src/Match.v	Tue Mar 08 11:50:53 2016 -0500
@@ -985,7 +985,7 @@
     -> P v2 u2
     -> P (f v1 v2) (g u1 u2).
 
-  Theorem t6 : forall v1 v2, Q v1 -> Q v2 -> exists u1, exists u2, P (f v1 v2) (g u1 u2).
+  Theorem t7 : forall v1 v2, Q v1 -> Q v2 -> exists u1, exists u2, P (f v1 v2) (g u1 u2).
 
     (** We can prove the goal by calling [insterKeep] with a tactic that tries to find and apply a [Q] hypothesis over a variable about which we do not yet know any [P] facts.  We need to begin this tactic code with [idtac; ] to get around a strange limitation in Coq's proof engine, where a first-class tactic argument may not begin with a [match]. *)