Mercurial > cpdt > repo
changeset 22:91e247c68ee8
Template generation
author | Adam Chlipala <adamc@hcoop.net> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:46:32 -0400 |
parents | 00366a62bd00 |
children | c8070689f5ca |
files | .hgignore Makefile src/StackMachine.v templates/.dir tools/make_template.ml |
diffstat | 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/.hgignore Wed Sep 03 16:37:51 2008 -0400 +++ b/.hgignore Fri Sep 05 16:46:32 2008 -0400 @@ -13,3 +13,5 @@ html/coqdoc.css html/*.html + +templates/*.v
--- a/Makefile Wed Sep 03 16:37:51 2008 -0400 +++ b/Makefile Fri Sep 05 16:46:32 2008 -0400 @@ -1,11 +1,14 @@ MODULES_NODOC := Tactics -MODULES_DOC := Intro StackMachine +MODULES_PROSE := StackMachine +MODULES_CODE := StackMachine +MODULES_DOC := $(MODULES_PROSE) $(MODULES_CODE) MODULES := $(MODULES_NODOC) $(MODULES_DOC) VS := $(MODULES:%=src/%.v) VS_DOC := $(MODULES_DOC:%=%.v) GLOBALS := .coq_globals +TEMPLATES := $(MODULES_CODE:%=templates/%.v) -.PHONY: coq clean doc dvi html +.PHONY: coq clean doc dvi html templates coq: Makefile.coq make -f Makefile.coq @@ -19,7 +22,7 @@ clean:: Makefile.coq make -f Makefile.coq clean rm -f Makefile.coq .depend $(GLOBALS) \ - latex/*.sty latex/cpdt.* + latex/*.sty latex/cpdt.* templates/*.v doc: latex/cpdt.dvi latex/cpdt.pdf html @@ -44,3 +47,8 @@ dvi: xdvi latex/cpdt + +templates: $(TEMPLATES) + +templates/%.v: src/%.v + ocaml tools/make_template.ml <$< >$@
--- a/src/StackMachine.v Wed Sep 03 16:37:51 2008 -0400 +++ b/src/StackMachine.v Fri Sep 05 16:46:32 2008 -0400 @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ (* begin hide *) Abort. (* end hide *) +(* begin thide *) (** Though a pencil-and-paper proof might clock out at this point, writing "by a routine induction on [e]," it turns out not to make sense to attack this proof directly. We need to use the standard trick of %\textit{%#<i>#strengthening the induction hypothesis#</i>#%}%. We do that by proving an auxiliary lemma: *) @@ -511,6 +512,7 @@ reflexivity. Qed. +(* end thide *) (** * Typed Expressions *) @@ -793,6 +795,7 @@ (* begin hide *) Abort. (* end hide *) +(* begin thide *) (** Again, we need to strengthen the theorem statement so that the induction will go through. This time, I will develop an alternative approach to this kind of proof, stating the key lemma as: *) @@ -851,3 +854,4 @@ Theorem tcompileCorrect : forall t (e : texp t), tprogDenote (tcompile e nil) tt = (texpDenote e, tt). crush. Qed. +(* end thide *)
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/tools/make_template.ml Fri Sep 05 16:46:32 2008 -0400 @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +let input_line () = + try + Some (input_line stdin) + with End_of_file -> None + +let rec initial last_was_empty = + match input_line () with + | None -> () + | Some "(* begin thide *)" -> thide last_was_empty + | Some "" -> + if not (last_was_empty) then + print_newline (); + initial true + | Some line -> + if String.length line >= 2 && line.[0] = '(' && line.[1] = '*' then + if line.[String.length line - 2] = '*' && line.[String.length line - 1] = ')' then + initial last_was_empty + else + comment last_was_empty + else begin + print_endline line; + initial false + end + +and comment last_was_empty = + match input_line () with + | None -> () + | Some line -> + if String.length line >= 2 && line.[String.length line - 2] = '*' + && line.[String.length line - 1] = ')' then + initial last_was_empty + else + comment last_was_empty + +and thide last_was_empty = + match input_line () with + | None -> () + | Some "(* end thide *)" -> initial last_was_empty + | Some _ -> thide last_was_empty + +let () = initial false