Mercurial > cpdt > repo
changeset 74:a21447f76aad
Break into Parts
| author | Adam Chlipala <adamc@hcoop.net> |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:29:21 -0400 |
| parents | 535e1cd17d9a |
| children | ec2c1830a7a1 |
| files | src/InductiveTypes.v src/Subset.v |
| diffstat | 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/InductiveTypes.v Fri Oct 03 14:14:28 2008 -0400 +++ b/src/InductiveTypes.v Fri Oct 03 14:29:21 2008 -0400 @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ (* end hide *) -(** %\chapter{Introducing Inductive Types}% *) +(** %\part{Basic Programming and Proving} + +\chapter{Introducing Inductive Types}% *) (** In a sense, CIC is built from just two relatively straightforward features: function types and inductive types. From this modest foundation, we can prove effectively all of the theorems of math and carry out effectively all program verifications, with enough effort expended. This chapter introduces induction and recursion for functional programming in Coq. *)
--- a/src/Subset.v Fri Oct 03 14:14:28 2008 -0400 +++ b/src/Subset.v Fri Oct 03 14:29:21 2008 -0400 @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ (* end hide *) -(** %\chapter{Subset Types and Variations}% *) +(** %\part{Programming with Dependent Types} + +\chapter{Subset Types and Variations}% *) (** So far, we have seen many examples of what we might call "classical program verification." We write programs, write their specifications, and then prove that the programs satisfy their specifications. The programs that we have written in Coq have been normal functional programs that we could just as well have written in Haskell or ML. In this chapter, we start investigating uses of %\textit{%#<i>#dependent types#</i>#%}% to integrate programming, specification, and proving into a single phase. *) @@ -569,10 +571,6 @@ Eval simpl in typeCheck (Plus (Nat 1) (Nat 2)). Eval simpl in typeCheck (Plus (Nat 1) (Bool false)). -Print sumor. - - - Notation "e1 ;;; e2" := (if e1 then e2 else !!) (right associativity, at level 60).